Mali vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Mali
238.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Sudan
127.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mali rank
199th
South Sudan rank
202nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Mali
  • South Sudan
050100150200250199020052021

How they compare

Mali currently reports 238.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 127.63 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 111.16 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.9 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mali ahead.

Mali ranks 199th and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 128.57 current US$ per square kilometre 91 current US$ per square kilometre 37.56 current US$ per square kilometre Mali
2020s 223.36 current US$ per square kilometre 122.09 current US$ per square kilometre 101.27 current US$ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Mali or South Sudan?
Mali, at 238.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 127.63 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Mali and South Sudan?
111.16 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and South Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Mali and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Mali ranks 199th and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/south-sudan/">Mali vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.