How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mali vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Mali

238.79 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Namibia

220.8 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Mali rank

199th

Namibia rank

200th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Mali
Namibia

How they compare

Mali currently reports 238.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Mali ranks 199th and Namibia ranks 200th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mali	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.36 current US$ per square kilometre	31.64 current US$ per square kilometre	29.28 current US$ per square kilometre	Namibia
2000s	33.67 current US$ per square kilometre	70.19 current US$ per square kilometre	36.51 current US$ per square kilometre	Namibia
2010s	116.99 current US$ per square kilometre	163.48 current US$ per square kilometre	46.49 current US$ per square kilometre	Namibia
2020s	223.36 current US$ per square kilometre	210.5 current US$ per square kilometre	12.85 current US$ per square kilometre	Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Mali or Namibia?: Mali, at 238.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Mali and Namibia?: 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Mali ranks 199th and Namibia ranks 200th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/namibia/">Mali vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.