Malawi vs Yemen: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Malawi
739.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Yemen
721.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Malawi rank
181st
Yemen rank
182nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Malawi
  • Yemen
05001.0k1.5k199020052021

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 739.99 current US$ per square kilometre against 721.28 current US$ per square kilometre in Yemen, a difference of 18.71 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 181st and Yemen ranks 182nd of 208 countries.

Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Yemen Difference Ahead
1990s 113.59 current US$ per square kilometre 294.86 current US$ per square kilometre 181.28 current US$ per square kilometre Yemen
2000s 195 current US$ per square kilometre 900.23 current US$ per square kilometre 705.23 current US$ per square kilometre Yemen
2010s 370.22 current US$ per square kilometre 1,158 current US$ per square kilometre 787.98 current US$ per square kilometre Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Malawi or Yemen?
Malawi, at 739.99 current US$ per square kilometre against 721.28 current US$ per square kilometre in Yemen as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Malawi and Yemen?
18.71 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Yemen?
29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
How do Malawi and Yemen rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Malawi ranks 181st and Yemen ranks 182nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Yemen: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/yemen-rep/">Malawi vs Yemen: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.