Macao vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Macao
3.63 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Singapore
2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Macao rank
1st
Singapore rank
3rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Macao
  • Singapore
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M197019952021

How they compare

Macao currently reports 3.63 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 715,300 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Macao ahead.

Macao ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 3rd of 208 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 927,394 current US$ per square kilometre 798,503 current US$ per square kilometre 128,892 current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2000s 1.55 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.30 million current US$ per square kilometre 244,026 current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2010s 2.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 301,987 current US$ per square kilometre Macao
2020s 3.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.76 million current US$ per square kilometre 724,030 current US$ per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Macao or Singapore?
Macao, at 3.63 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Macao and Singapore?
715,300 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Singapore?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Macao and Singapore rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Macao ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 3rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macao vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.