Libya vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Libya
1,495 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1,291 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Libya rank
163rd
Zimbabwe rank
165th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Libya
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k199020052021

How they compare

Libya currently reports 1,495 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,291 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 204 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Libya ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 165th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 320.21 current US$ per square kilometre 615.04 current US$ per square kilometre 294.84 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 653.49 current US$ per square kilometre 610.1 current US$ per square kilometre 43.39 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 1,069 current US$ per square kilometre 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre 42.21 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 1,273 current US$ per square kilometre 1,220 current US$ per square kilometre 52.92 current US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Libya or Zimbabwe?
Libya, at 1,495 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,291 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Libya and Zimbabwe?
204 current US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Libya ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 165th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/">Libya vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.