Latvia vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Latvia
5,144 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nepal
5,142 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Latvia rank
130th
Nepal rank
131st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Latvia
  • Nepal
02.0k4.0k6.0k199020052021

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 5,144 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,142 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 2 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 131st of 208 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 2,405 current US$ per square kilometre 221.44 current US$ per square kilometre 2,183 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 2,842 current US$ per square kilometre 490.93 current US$ per square kilometre 2,351 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 4,165 current US$ per square kilometre 2,194 current US$ per square kilometre 1,971 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 4,983 current US$ per square kilometre 4,684 current US$ per square kilometre 298.65 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Latvia or Nepal?
Latvia, at 5,144 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,142 current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Latvia and Nepal?
2 current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Latvia ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 131st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/nepal/">Latvia vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.