Kiribati vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Kiribati
5,536 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
New Zealand
5,692 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kiribati rank
125th
New Zealand rank
123rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Kiribati
  • New Zealand
02.0k4.0k6.0k199020052021

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 5,692 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,536 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 156 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 125th and New Zealand ranks 123rd of 208 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 506.83 current US$ per square kilometre 1,438 current US$ per square kilometre 930.86 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 1,487 current US$ per square kilometre 2,846 current US$ per square kilometre 1,359 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 2,952 current US$ per square kilometre 4,187 current US$ per square kilometre 1,236 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 5,209 current US$ per square kilometre 5,477 current US$ per square kilometre 267.87 current US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Kiribati or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 5,692 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,536 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Kiribati and New Zealand?
156 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and New Zealand?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Kiribati and New Zealand rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Kiribati ranks 125th and New Zealand ranks 123rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/new-zealand/">Kiribati vs New Zealand: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.