Kiribati vs Laos: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Kiribati
5,536 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Laos
5,541 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kiribati rank
125th
Laos rank
124th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Kiribati
  • Laos
02.0k4.0k6.0k199020052021

How they compare

Laos currently reports 5,541 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,536 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 5 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 125th and Laos ranks 124th of 208 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Laos Difference Ahead
1990s 506.83 current US$ per square kilometre 45.82 current US$ per square kilometre 461.01 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 1,487 current US$ per square kilometre 151.04 current US$ per square kilometre 1,336 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 2,952 current US$ per square kilometre 1,587 current US$ per square kilometre 1,365 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 5,209 current US$ per square kilometre 4,856 current US$ per square kilometre 352.18 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Kiribati or Laos?
Laos, at 5,541 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,536 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Kiribati and Laos?
5 current US$ per square kilometre, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Laos?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Kiribati and Laos rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Kiribati ranks 125th and Laos ranks 124th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Laos: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/lao-pdr/">Kiribati vs Laos: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.