Kazakhstan vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Kazakhstan
3,228 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
East Timor
3,079 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kazakhstan rank
144th
East Timor rank
145th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • East Timor
01.0k2.0k3.0k199220062021

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 3,228 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,079 current US$ per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 149 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 144th and East Timor ranks 145th of 208 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 1,629 current US$ per square kilometre 322.29 current US$ per square kilometre 1,307 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 2,815 current US$ per square kilometre 1,130 current US$ per square kilometre 1,685 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 3,145 current US$ per square kilometre 2,800 current US$ per square kilometre 344.08 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Kazakhstan or East Timor?
Kazakhstan, at 3,228 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,079 current US$ per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Kazakhstan and East Timor?
149 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and East Timor?
20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
How do Kazakhstan and East Timor rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Kazakhstan ranks 144th and East Timor ranks 145th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/timor-leste/">Kazakhstan vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.