Indonesia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Indonesia
14,493 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Africa
15,719 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Indonesia rank
80th
South Africa rank
78th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Indonesia
  • South Africa
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020052021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 15,719 current US$ per square kilometre against 14,493 current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 1,226 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 80th and South Africa ranks 78th of 208 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1,803 current US$ per square kilometre 3,269 current US$ per square kilometre 1,466 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 4,227 current US$ per square kilometre 7,001 current US$ per square kilometre 2,774 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 9,232 current US$ per square kilometre 12,210 current US$ per square kilometre 2,977 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 13,957 current US$ per square kilometre 14,950 current US$ per square kilometre 992.9 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Indonesia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 15,719 current US$ per square kilometre against 14,493 current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Indonesia and South Africa?
1,226 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and South Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Indonesia and South Africa rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Indonesia ranks 80th and South Africa ranks 78th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/south-africa/">Indonesia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.