Hong Kong vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Hong Kong
1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Singapore
2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
5th
Singapore rank
3rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Singapore
01.0M2.0M3.0M197019952021

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.49 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 2.0 times Hong Kong's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 208 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 574,241 current US$ per square kilometre 798,503 current US$ per square kilometre 224,262 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 931,805 current US$ per square kilometre 1.30 million current US$ per square kilometre 371,821 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 1.46 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 752,297 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.76 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.39 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Hong Kong or Singapore?
Singapore, at 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Hong Kong and Singapore?
1.49 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Singapore?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Singapore rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.