Hong Kong vs Qatar: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Hong Kong
1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Qatar
355,917 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
5th
Qatar rank
7th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Qatar
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197019952021

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre against 355,917 current US$ per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 1.07 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 4.0 times Qatar's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 5th and Qatar ranks 7th of 208 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Qatar Difference Ahead
1990s 574,241 current US$ per square kilometre 26,335 current US$ per square kilometre 547,906 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 931,805 current US$ per square kilometre 81,489 current US$ per square kilometre 850,315 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 1.46 million current US$ per square kilometre 241,101 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 341,383 current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Hong Kong or Qatar?
Hong Kong, at 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre against 355,917 current US$ per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Hong Kong and Qatar?
1.07 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Qatar?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Qatar rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Qatar ranks 7th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Qatar: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/qatar/">Hong Kong vs Qatar: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.