Hong Kong vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Hong Kong
1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Maldives
322,448 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong rank
5th
Maldives rank
8th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Maldives
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197019952021

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre against 322,448 current US$ per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 4.4 times Maldives's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 5th and Maldives ranks 8th of 208 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Maldives Difference Ahead
1990s 574,241 current US$ per square kilometre 13,268 current US$ per square kilometre 560,974 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 931,805 current US$ per square kilometre 55,668 current US$ per square kilometre 876,136 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 1.46 million current US$ per square kilometre 174,799 current US$ per square kilometre 1.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 263,778 current US$ per square kilometre 1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Hong Kong or Maldives?
Hong Kong, at 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre against 322,448 current US$ per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Hong Kong and Maldives?
1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Maldives?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Maldives rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Maldives ranks 8th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/maldives/">Hong Kong vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.