Honduras vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Honduras
4,074 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Norway
4,352 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Honduras rank
138th
Norway rank
135th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Honduras
  • Norway
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199020052021

How they compare

Norway currently reports 4,352 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,074 current US$ per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 278 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Honduras ranks 138th and Norway ranks 135th of 208 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 481.24 current US$ per square kilometre 1,397 current US$ per square kilometre 915.97 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 1,490 current US$ per square kilometre 2,289 current US$ per square kilometre 799.28 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 2,902 current US$ per square kilometre 3,634 current US$ per square kilometre 731.55 current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 3,762 current US$ per square kilometre 4,190 current US$ per square kilometre 428.32 current US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Honduras or Norway?
Norway, at 4,352 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,074 current US$ per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Honduras and Norway?
278 current US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Norway?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Honduras and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Honduras ranks 138th and Norway ranks 135th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/norway/">Honduras vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.