Guam vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Guam
152,956 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Trinidad and Tobago
130,743 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guam rank
16th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
19th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Guam
  • Trinidad and Tobago
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k198020002021

How they compare

Guam currently reports 152,956 current US$ per square kilometre against 130,743 current US$ per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 22,213 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guam's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guam ahead.

Guam ranks 16th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 19th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 88,519 current US$ per square kilometre 30,521 current US$ per square kilometre 57,998 current US$ per square kilometre Guam
2000s 136,909 current US$ per square kilometre 74,902 current US$ per square kilometre 62,006 current US$ per square kilometre Guam
2010s 123,139 current US$ per square kilometre 134,223 current US$ per square kilometre 11,084 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 144,410 current US$ per square kilometre 128,925 current US$ per square kilometre 15,486 current US$ per square kilometre Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Guam or Trinidad and Tobago?
Guam, at 152,956 current US$ per square kilometre against 130,743 current US$ per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Guam and Trinidad and Tobago?
22,213 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Guam and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Guam ranks 16th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 19th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guam/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guam/trinidad-and-tobago/">Guam vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.