Guam vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Guam
152,956 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Netherlands
187,980 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guam rank
16th
Netherlands rank
13th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Guam
  • Netherlands
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k198020002021

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 187,980 current US$ per square kilometre against 152,956 current US$ per square kilometre in Guam, a difference of 35,024 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.2 times Guam's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Netherlands ahead.

Guam ranks 16th and Netherlands ranks 13th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 88,519 current US$ per square kilometre 71,376 current US$ per square kilometre 17,143 current US$ per square kilometre Guam
2000s 136,909 current US$ per square kilometre 112,657 current US$ per square kilometre 24,251 current US$ per square kilometre Guam
2010s 123,139 current US$ per square kilometre 158,906 current US$ per square kilometre 35,767 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 144,410 current US$ per square kilometre 180,022 current US$ per square kilometre 35,611 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Guam or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 187,980 current US$ per square kilometre against 152,956 current US$ per square kilometre in Guam as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Guam and Netherlands?
35,024 current US$ per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Netherlands?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Guam and Netherlands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Guam ranks 16th and Netherlands ranks 13th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guam/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guam/netherlands/">Guam vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.