Guam vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Guam
152,956 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta
179,551 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guam rank
16th
Malta rank
14th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Guam
  • Malta
0100.0k200.0k300.0k198020002021

How they compare

Malta currently reports 179,551 current US$ per square kilometre against 152,956 current US$ per square kilometre in Guam, a difference of 26,595 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Guam's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.

Guam ranks 16th and Malta ranks 14th of 208 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 88,519 current US$ per square kilometre 112,214 current US$ per square kilometre 23,695 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 136,909 current US$ per square kilometre 182,927 current US$ per square kilometre 46,018 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 123,139 current US$ per square kilometre 213,362 current US$ per square kilometre 90,223 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 144,410 current US$ per square kilometre 177,249 current US$ per square kilometre 32,838 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Guam or Malta?
Malta, at 179,551 current US$ per square kilometre against 152,956 current US$ per square kilometre in Guam as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Guam and Malta?
26,595 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Malta?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Guam and Malta rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Guam ranks 16th and Malta ranks 14th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guam/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guam/malta/">Guam vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.