Gibraltar vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Gibraltar
3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Singapore
2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Gibraltar rank
2nd
Singapore rank
3rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Singapore
01.0M2.0M3.0M197019952021

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 102,830 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Singapore ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 401,711 current US$ per square kilometre 798,503 current US$ per square kilometre 396,792 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 919,299 current US$ per square kilometre 1.30 million current US$ per square kilometre 384,327 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 1.99 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 220,209 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 2.89 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.76 million current US$ per square kilometre 125,765 current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Gibraltar or Singapore?
Gibraltar, at 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Gibraltar and Singapore?
102,830 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Singapore?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Gibraltar and Singapore rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Gibraltar ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/singapore/">Gibraltar vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.