Gibraltar vs Macao: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square
Gibraltar
3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Macao
3.63 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Gibraltar rank
2nd
Macao rank
1st
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time
- Gibraltar
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 3.63 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre in Gibraltar, a difference of 612,470 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Macao's figure about 1.2 times Gibraltar's.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 2nd and Macao ranks 1st of 208 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 25,358 current US$ per square kilometre | 79,301 current US$ per square kilometre | 53,943 current US$ per square kilometre | Macao |
| 1980s | 98,818 current US$ per square kilometre | 309,660 current US$ per square kilometre | 210,842 current US$ per square kilometre | Macao |
| 1990s | 401,711 current US$ per square kilometre | 927,394 current US$ per square kilometre | 525,684 current US$ per square kilometre | Macao |
| 2000s | 919,299 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.55 million current US$ per square kilometre | 628,353 current US$ per square kilometre | Macao |
| 2010s | 1.99 million current US$ per square kilometre | 2.51 million current US$ per square kilometre | 522,196 current US$ per square kilometre | Macao |
| 2020s | 2.89 million current US$ per square kilometre | 3.49 million current US$ per square kilometre | 598,265 current US$ per square kilometre | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Gibraltar or Macao?
- Macao, at 3.63 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre in Gibraltar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Gibraltar and Macao?
- 612,470 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Macao?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Gibraltar and Macao rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
- Gibraltar ranks 2nd and Macao ranks 1st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.