Gibraltar vs Hong Kong: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time
- Gibraltar
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.60 million current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Gibraltar's figure about 2.1 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 2nd and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 208 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 25,358 current US$ per square kilometre | 49,943 current US$ per square kilometre | 24,584 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 98,818 current US$ per square kilometre | 235,597 current US$ per square kilometre | 136,779 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 401,711 current US$ per square kilometre | 574,241 current US$ per square kilometre | 172,531 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 919,299 current US$ per square kilometre | 931,805 current US$ per square kilometre | 12,505 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 1.99 million current US$ per square kilometre | 1.46 million current US$ per square kilometre | 532,088 current US$ per square kilometre | Gibraltar |
| 2020s | 2.89 million current US$ per square kilometre | 1.37 million current US$ per square kilometre | 1.51 million current US$ per square kilometre | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Gibraltar or Hong Kong?
- Gibraltar, at 3.02 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Gibraltar and Hong Kong?
- 1.60 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Hong Kong?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Gibraltar and Hong Kong rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
- Gibraltar ranks 2nd and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.