Ghana vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Ghana
4,216 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sweden
3,590 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ghana rank
137th
Sweden rank
139th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Ghana
  • Sweden
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199020052021

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 4,216 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,590 current US$ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 626 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.

Ghana ranks 137th and Sweden ranks 139th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 271.38 current US$ per square kilometre 2,116 current US$ per square kilometre 1,845 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 786.86 current US$ per square kilometre 2,809 current US$ per square kilometre 2,022 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 2,395 current US$ per square kilometre 3,355 current US$ per square kilometre 960.63 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 3,979 current US$ per square kilometre 3,480 current US$ per square kilometre 498.95 current US$ per square kilometre Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Ghana or Sweden?
Ghana, at 4,216 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,590 current US$ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Ghana and Sweden?
626 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Sweden?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Ghana and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Ghana ranks 137th and Sweden ranks 139th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ghana/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ghana/sweden/">Ghana vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.