Faroe Islands vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Faroe Islands
27,671 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malaysia
32,195 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Faroe Islands rank
54th
Malaysia rank
51st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Malaysia
010.0k20.0k30.0k199020052021

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 32,195 current US$ per square kilometre against 27,671 current US$ per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 4,524 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 54th and Malaysia ranks 51st of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 7,439 current US$ per square kilometre 4,405 current US$ per square kilometre 3,034 current US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 11,590 current US$ per square kilometre 11,451 current US$ per square kilometre 138.91 current US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 18,954 current US$ per square kilometre 23,887 current US$ per square kilometre 4,933 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 26,186 current US$ per square kilometre 31,090 current US$ per square kilometre 4,904 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Faroe Islands or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 32,195 current US$ per square kilometre against 27,671 current US$ per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Faroe Islands and Malaysia?
4,524 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Malaysia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Faroe Islands and Malaysia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Faroe Islands ranks 54th and Malaysia ranks 51st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/malaysia/">Faroe Islands vs Malaysia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.