Estonia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time
- Estonia
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 10,421 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,856 current US$ per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 565 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 100th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 98th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,300 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,313 current US$ per square kilometre | 7,986 current US$ per square kilometre | Estonia |
| 2010s | 13,025 current US$ per square kilometre | 7,788 current US$ per square kilometre | 5,237 current US$ per square kilometre | Estonia |
| 2020s | 9,550 current US$ per square kilometre | 9,792 current US$ per square kilometre | 242.52 current US$ per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Estonia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 10,421 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,856 current US$ per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 565 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
- Estonia ranks 100th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 98th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.