Estonia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Estonia
9,856 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
10,667 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Estonia rank
100th
Saudi Arabia rank
97th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Estonia
  • Saudi Arabia
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020052021

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 10,667 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,856 current US$ per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 811 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 100th and Saudi Arabia ranks 97th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 6,448 current US$ per square kilometre 1,574 current US$ per square kilometre 4,874 current US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 9,023 current US$ per square kilometre 3,444 current US$ per square kilometre 5,579 current US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 13,025 current US$ per square kilometre 8,296 current US$ per square kilometre 4,730 current US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 9,550 current US$ per square kilometre 10,217 current US$ per square kilometre 667.76 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Estonia or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 10,667 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,856 current US$ per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Estonia and Saudi Arabia?
811 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Saudi Arabia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Estonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Estonia ranks 100th and Saudi Arabia ranks 97th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/saudi-arabia/">Estonia vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.