Eritrea vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Eritrea
354.56 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sudan
515.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eritrea rank
196th
Sudan rank
193rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Eritrea
  • Sudan
100200300400500199320072021

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 515.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 354.56 current US$ per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 161.14 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.5 times Eritrea's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 196th and Sudan ranks 193rd of 208 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 210.9 current US$ per square kilometre 359.84 current US$ per square kilometre 148.94 current US$ per square kilometre Sudan
2020s 337.11 current US$ per square kilometre 492.91 current US$ per square kilometre 155.8 current US$ per square kilometre Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Eritrea or Sudan?
Sudan, at 515.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 354.56 current US$ per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Eritrea and Sudan?
161.14 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Eritrea and Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Eritrea ranks 196th and Sudan ranks 193rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/sudan/">Eritrea vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.