El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

El Salvador
16,747 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sri Lanka
17,844 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
El Salvador rank
76th
Sri Lanka rank
75th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • El Salvador
  • Sri Lanka
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199020052021

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 17,844 current US$ per square kilometre against 16,747 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 1,097 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 76th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 3,203 current US$ per square kilometre 1,595 current US$ per square kilometre 1,609 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 7,362 current US$ per square kilometre 4,545 current US$ per square kilometre 2,817 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 11,364 current US$ per square kilometre 10,625 current US$ per square kilometre 739.38 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 15,577 current US$ per square kilometre 16,880 current US$ per square kilometre 1,304 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, El Salvador or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 17,844 current US$ per square kilometre against 16,747 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
1,097 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do El Salvador and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
El Salvador ranks 76th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sri-lanka/">El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.