Egypt vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Egypt
11,841 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Pakistan
11,685 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Egypt rank
92nd
Pakistan rank
93rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Egypt
  • Pakistan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020052021

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 11,841 current US$ per square kilometre against 11,685 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 156 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 92nd and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 1,481 current US$ per square kilometre 1,549 current US$ per square kilometre 68.14 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 3,659 current US$ per square kilometre 3,675 current US$ per square kilometre 16.93 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 7,831 current US$ per square kilometre 7,445 current US$ per square kilometre 386.12 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 11,341 current US$ per square kilometre 10,987 current US$ per square kilometre 353.9 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Egypt or Pakistan?
Egypt, at 11,841 current US$ per square kilometre against 11,685 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Egypt and Pakistan?
156 current US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Pakistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Egypt and Pakistan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Egypt ranks 92nd and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/pakistan/">Egypt vs Pakistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.