Ecuador vs Panama: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Ecuador
6,644 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Panama
7,125 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador rank
118th
Panama rank
115th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Panama
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020052021

How they compare

Panama currently reports 7,125 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,644 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 481 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 118th and Panama ranks 115th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 1,133 current US$ per square kilometre 853.22 current US$ per square kilometre 279.77 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 2,597 current US$ per square kilometre 2,079 current US$ per square kilometre 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 5,438 current US$ per square kilometre 4,926 current US$ per square kilometre 512.03 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 6,354 current US$ per square kilometre 6,564 current US$ per square kilometre 210.37 current US$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Ecuador or Panama?
Panama, at 7,125 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,644 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Ecuador and Panama?
481 current US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 118th and Panama ranks 115th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Panama: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/panama/">Ecuador vs Panama: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.