Ecuador vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Ecuador
6,644 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Georgia
7,068 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador rank
118th
Georgia rank
116th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Georgia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020052021

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 7,068 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,644 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 424 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 118th and Georgia ranks 116th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,241 current US$ per square kilometre 2,034 current US$ per square kilometre 793.05 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 2,597 current US$ per square kilometre 1,441 current US$ per square kilometre 1,156 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 5,438 current US$ per square kilometre 4,211 current US$ per square kilometre 1,227 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 6,354 current US$ per square kilometre 6,463 current US$ per square kilometre 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Ecuador or Georgia?
Georgia, at 7,068 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,644 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Ecuador and Georgia?
424 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Georgia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Georgia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 118th and Georgia ranks 116th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/georgia/">Ecuador vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.