Cuba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time
- Cuba
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 10,421 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,523 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 898 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 101st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 98th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,850 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,313 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,537 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2010s | 9,006 current US$ per square kilometre | 7,788 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,218 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2020s | 9,317 current US$ per square kilometre | 9,792 current US$ per square kilometre | 475.4 current US$ per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Cuba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 10,421 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,523 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Cuba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 898 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Cuba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
- Cuba ranks 101st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 98th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.