Cuba vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Cuba
9,523 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guatemala
9,124 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba rank
101st
Guatemala rank
104th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Cuba
  • Guatemala
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199020052021

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 9,523 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,124 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 399 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 101st and Guatemala ranks 104th of 208 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 3,581 current US$ per square kilometre 846.05 current US$ per square kilometre 2,735 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 5,755 current US$ per square kilometre 2,365 current US$ per square kilometre 3,391 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 9,006 current US$ per square kilometre 4,914 current US$ per square kilometre 4,091 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 9,317 current US$ per square kilometre 8,407 current US$ per square kilometre 910 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Cuba or Guatemala?
Cuba, at 9,523 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,124 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Cuba and Guatemala?
399 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 101st and Guatemala ranks 104th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/guatemala/">Cuba vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.