Costa Rica vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Costa Rica
7,239 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Georgia
7,068 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Costa Rica rank
114th
Georgia rank
116th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Georgia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020052021

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 7,239 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,068 current US$ per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 171 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 114th and Georgia ranks 116th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,421 current US$ per square kilometre 2,034 current US$ per square kilometre 612.95 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 2,868 current US$ per square kilometre 1,441 current US$ per square kilometre 1,427 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 5,282 current US$ per square kilometre 4,211 current US$ per square kilometre 1,071 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 6,829 current US$ per square kilometre 6,463 current US$ per square kilometre 365.27 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Costa Rica or Georgia?
Costa Rica, at 7,239 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,068 current US$ per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Costa Rica and Georgia?
171 current US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Georgia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Costa Rica and Georgia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Costa Rica ranks 114th and Georgia ranks 116th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/georgia/">Costa Rica vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.