Costa Rica vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Costa Rica
7,239 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Equatorial Guinea
7,579 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Costa Rica rank
114th
Equatorial Guinea rank
111th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Equatorial Guinea
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k199020052021

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 7,579 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,239 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 340 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 114th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 111th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 1,282 current US$ per square kilometre 700.04 current US$ per square kilometre 581.59 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 2,868 current US$ per square kilometre 5,763 current US$ per square kilometre 2,895 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 5,282 current US$ per square kilometre 9,288 current US$ per square kilometre 4,006 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 6,829 current US$ per square kilometre 7,506 current US$ per square kilometre 677.43 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Costa Rica or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 7,579 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,239 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea?
340 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Costa Rica and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Costa Rica ranks 114th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 111th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/equatorial-guinea/">Costa Rica vs Equatorial Guinea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.