How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guyana?

32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Congo

952.16 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Guyana

1,089 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Congo rank

172nd

Guyana rank

169th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Congo
Guyana

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 1,089 current US$ per square kilometre against 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 136.84 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 172nd and Guyana ranks 169th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Guyana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Guyana	Difference	Ahead
1990s	137.96 current US$ per square kilometre	110.26 current US$ per square kilometre	27.7 current US$ per square kilometre	Congo
2000s	275.03 current US$ per square kilometre	184.22 current US$ per square kilometre	90.81 current US$ per square kilometre	Congo
2010s	577.72 current US$ per square kilometre	392.12 current US$ per square kilometre	185.6 current US$ per square kilometre	Congo
2020s	914.03 current US$ per square kilometre	961.35 current US$ per square kilometre	47.32 current US$ per square kilometre	Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Congo or Guyana?: Guyana, at 1,089 current US$ per square kilometre against 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Congo and Guyana?: 136.84 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guyana?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Congo and Guyana rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Congo ranks 172nd and Guyana ranks 169th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guyana/">Congo vs Guyana: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.