Congo vs Ethiopia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Congo
952.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Ethiopia
868.3 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo rank
172nd
Ethiopia rank
175th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Congo
  • Ethiopia
02004006008001.0k199020052021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 868.3 current US$ per square kilometre in Ethiopia, a difference of 83.86 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 172nd and Ethiopia ranks 175th of 208 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 146.23 current US$ per square kilometre 43.95 current US$ per square kilometre 102.27 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 275.03 current US$ per square kilometre 112.48 current US$ per square kilometre 162.55 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 577.72 current US$ per square kilometre 391.34 current US$ per square kilometre 186.38 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 914.03 current US$ per square kilometre 808.54 current US$ per square kilometre 105.5 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Congo or Ethiopia?
Congo, at 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 868.3 current US$ per square kilometre in Ethiopia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Congo and Ethiopia?
83.86 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ethiopia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2021.
How do Congo and Ethiopia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Congo ranks 172nd and Ethiopia ranks 175th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Ethiopia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/ethiopia/">Congo vs Ethiopia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.