Colombia vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Colombia
3,317 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kazakhstan
3,228 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Colombia rank
141st
Kazakhstan rank
144th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Colombia
  • Kazakhstan
1.0k2.0k3.0k199020052021

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 3,317 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,228 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 89 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Colombia ranks 141st and Kazakhstan ranks 144th of 208 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 823.34 current US$ per square kilometre 981.76 current US$ per square kilometre 158.42 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 1,206 current US$ per square kilometre 1,470 current US$ per square kilometre 263.92 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 2,356 current US$ per square kilometre 2,815 current US$ per square kilometre 458.53 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 3,076 current US$ per square kilometre 3,145 current US$ per square kilometre 68.12 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Colombia or Kazakhstan?
Colombia, at 3,317 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,228 current US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Colombia and Kazakhstan?
89 current US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Colombia and Kazakhstan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Colombia ranks 141st and Kazakhstan ranks 144th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/kazakhstan/">Colombia vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.