How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nigeria?

32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Nigeria: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Chile

5,792 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Nigeria

5,745 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Chile rank

121st

Nigeria rank

122nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Chile
Nigeria

How they compare

Chile currently reports 5,792 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,745 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 47 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nigeria ahead.

Chile ranks 121st and Nigeria ranks 122nd of 208 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Nigeria	Difference	Ahead
1990s	826.13 current US$ per square kilometre	1,441 current US$ per square kilometre	615.13 current US$ per square kilometre	Nigeria
2000s	1,766 current US$ per square kilometre	2,302 current US$ per square kilometre	535.56 current US$ per square kilometre	Nigeria
2010s	3,813 current US$ per square kilometre	4,010 current US$ per square kilometre	197.79 current US$ per square kilometre	Nigeria
2020s	5,331 current US$ per square kilometre	5,482 current US$ per square kilometre	151.39 current US$ per square kilometre	Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Chile or Nigeria?: Chile, at 5,792 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,745 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Chile and Nigeria?: 47 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nigeria?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Chile and Nigeria rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Chile ranks 121st and Nigeria ranks 122nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nigeria: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/nigeria/">Chile vs Nigeria: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.