How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?

32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Chile

5,792 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Ecuador

6,644 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Chile rank

121st

Ecuador rank

118th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Chile
Ecuador

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 6,644 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,792 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 852 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 121st and Ecuador ranks 118th of 208 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
1990s	826.13 current US$ per square kilometre	1,133 current US$ per square kilometre	306.87 current US$ per square kilometre	Ecuador
2000s	1,766 current US$ per square kilometre	2,597 current US$ per square kilometre	831.1 current US$ per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	3,813 current US$ per square kilometre	5,438 current US$ per square kilometre	1,625 current US$ per square kilometre	Ecuador
2020s	5,331 current US$ per square kilometre	6,354 current US$ per square kilometre	1,023 current US$ per square kilometre	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Chile or Ecuador?: Ecuador, at 6,644 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,792 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Chile and Ecuador?: 852 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Chile ranks 121st and Ecuador ranks 118th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.