Chad vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Chad
86.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Sudan
127.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Chad rank
203rd
South Sudan rank
202nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Chad
  • South Sudan
0255075100125199020052021

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 127.63 current US$ per square kilometre against 86.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 41.56 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.5 times Chad's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 203rd and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 62.06 current US$ per square kilometre 91 current US$ per square kilometre 28.95 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 81.94 current US$ per square kilometre 122.09 current US$ per square kilometre 40.14 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Chad or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 127.63 current US$ per square kilometre against 86.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Chad and South Sudan?
41.56 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and South Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Chad and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Chad ranks 203rd and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/south-sudan/">Chad vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.