How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Chad

86.07 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Namibia

220.8 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Chad rank

203rd

Namibia rank

200th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Chad
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre against 86.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 134.73 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 2.6 times Chad's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 203rd and Namibia ranks 200th of 208 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	5.39 current US$ per square kilometre	31.64 current US$ per square kilometre	26.25 current US$ per square kilometre	Namibia
2000s	8.92 current US$ per square kilometre	70.19 current US$ per square kilometre	61.27 current US$ per square kilometre	Namibia
2010s	55.07 current US$ per square kilometre	163.48 current US$ per square kilometre	108.41 current US$ per square kilometre	Namibia
2020s	81.94 current US$ per square kilometre	210.5 current US$ per square kilometre	128.56 current US$ per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Chad or Namibia?: Namibia, at 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre against 86.07 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Chad and Namibia?: 134.73 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Chad and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Chad ranks 203rd and Namibia ranks 200th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/namibia/">Chad vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.