Central African Republic vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Central African Republic
20.31 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Greenland
51.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Central African Republic rank
208th
Greenland rank
206th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Greenland
0204060197019952021

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 51.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 20.31 current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 30.77 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Greenland's figure about 2.5 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 208th and Greenland ranks 206th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Greenland Difference Ahead
1990s 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1305 current US$ per square kilometre 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 8.1 current US$ per square kilometre 22.63 current US$ per square kilometre 14.53 current US$ per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 10.62 current US$ per square kilometre 45.63 current US$ per square kilometre 35.01 current US$ per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 18.95 current US$ per square kilometre 48.93 current US$ per square kilometre 29.98 current US$ per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Central African Republic or Greenland?
Greenland, at 51.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 20.31 current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Central African Republic and Greenland?
30.77 current US$ per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Greenland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Central African Republic and Greenland rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Central African Republic ranks 208th and Greenland ranks 206th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/">Central African Republic vs Greenland: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.