How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Congo?

32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cameroon vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Cameroon

931.05 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Congo

952.16 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Cameroon rank

173rd

Congo rank

172nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Cameroon
Congo

How they compare

Congo currently reports 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 931.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 21.11 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Cameroon ranks 173rd and Congo ranks 172nd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cameroon	Congo	Difference	Ahead
1990s	161.58 current US$ per square kilometre	137.96 current US$ per square kilometre	23.63 current US$ per square kilometre	Cameroon
2000s	272.43 current US$ per square kilometre	275.03 current US$ per square kilometre	2.6 current US$ per square kilometre	Congo
2010s	605.59 current US$ per square kilometre	577.72 current US$ per square kilometre	27.87 current US$ per square kilometre	Cameroon
2020s	886.92 current US$ per square kilometre	914.03 current US$ per square kilometre	27.12 current US$ per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Cameroon or Congo?: Congo, at 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 931.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Cameroon and Congo?: 21.11 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Congo?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cameroon and Congo rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Cameroon ranks 173rd and Congo ranks 172nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/congo-rep/">Cameroon vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.