Cape Verde vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Cape Verde
6,534 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Georgia
7,068 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cape Verde rank
119th
Georgia rank
116th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Georgia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020052021

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 7,068 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,534 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 534 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 119th and Georgia ranks 116th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 536.13 current US$ per square kilometre 2,034 current US$ per square kilometre 1,498 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 2,221 current US$ per square kilometre 1,441 current US$ per square kilometre 779.75 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 4,760 current US$ per square kilometre 4,211 current US$ per square kilometre 549.28 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 6,148 current US$ per square kilometre 6,463 current US$ per square kilometre 315.15 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Cape Verde or Georgia?
Georgia, at 7,068 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,534 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Cape Verde and Georgia?
534 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Georgia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Cape Verde and Georgia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Cape Verde ranks 119th and Georgia ranks 116th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/georgia/">Cape Verde vs Georgia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.