Burkina Faso vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Burkina Faso
956.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo
952.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
171st
Congo rank
172nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Congo
02004006008001.0k199020052021

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 956.32 current US$ per square kilometre against 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 171st and Congo ranks 172nd of 208 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 34.31 current US$ per square kilometre 137.96 current US$ per square kilometre 103.65 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 104.4 current US$ per square kilometre 275.03 current US$ per square kilometre 170.63 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 455.62 current US$ per square kilometre 577.72 current US$ per square kilometre 122.1 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 883.98 current US$ per square kilometre 914.03 current US$ per square kilometre 30.05 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Burkina Faso or Congo?
Burkina Faso, at 956.32 current US$ per square kilometre against 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Burkina Faso and Congo?
4.16 current US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Congo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Burkina Faso and Congo rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Burkina Faso ranks 171st and Congo ranks 172nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/congo-rep/">Burkina Faso vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.