How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Yemen?

29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs Yemen: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Botswana

658.09 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Yemen

721.28 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2018

Botswana rank

185th

Yemen rank

182nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Botswana
Yemen

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 721.28 current US$ per square kilometre against 658.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 63.19 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 185th and Yemen ranks 182nd of 208 countries.

Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	Yemen	Difference	Ahead
1990s	84.96 current US$ per square kilometre	294.86 current US$ per square kilometre	209.9 current US$ per square kilometre	Yemen
2000s	166.88 current US$ per square kilometre	900.23 current US$ per square kilometre	733.35 current US$ per square kilometre	Yemen
2010s	346.82 current US$ per square kilometre	1,158 current US$ per square kilometre	811.38 current US$ per square kilometre	Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Botswana or Yemen?: Yemen, at 721.28 current US$ per square kilometre against 658.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2018.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Botswana and Yemen?: 63.19 current US$ per square kilometre, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Yemen?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
How do Botswana and Yemen rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Botswana ranks 185th and Yemen ranks 182nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Yemen: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/yemen-rep/">Botswana vs Yemen: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.