Botswana vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Botswana
658.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Suriname
645.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Botswana rank
185th
Suriname rank
186th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Botswana
  • Suriname
0200400600199020052021

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 658.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 645.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 12.22 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Suriname ahead.

Botswana ranks 185th and Suriname ranks 186th of 208 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 84.96 current US$ per square kilometre 192.93 current US$ per square kilometre 107.97 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 166.88 current US$ per square kilometre 204.62 current US$ per square kilometre 37.74 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 364.31 current US$ per square kilometre 520.01 current US$ per square kilometre 155.7 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 590.18 current US$ per square kilometre 624.67 current US$ per square kilometre 34.48 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Botswana or Suriname?
Botswana, at 658.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 645.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Botswana and Suriname?
12.22 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Botswana ranks 185th and Suriname ranks 186th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.