Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
18,496 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
El Salvador
16,747 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
74th
El Salvador rank
76th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • El Salvador
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199020052021

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 18,496 current US$ per square kilometre against 16,747 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 1,749 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and El Salvador ranks 76th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and El Salvador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 2,631 current US$ per square kilometre 3,593 current US$ per square kilometre 961.65 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 7,626 current US$ per square kilometre 7,362 current US$ per square kilometre 264.22 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 14,505 current US$ per square kilometre 11,364 current US$ per square kilometre 3,140 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 17,480 current US$ per square kilometre 15,577 current US$ per square kilometre 1,904 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Bosnia and Herzegovina or El Salvador?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 18,496 current US$ per square kilometre against 16,747 current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
1,749 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 74th and El Salvador ranks 76th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/el-salvador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.