Bolivia vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Bolivia
899.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Congo
952.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bolivia rank
174th
Congo rank
172nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Bolivia
  • Congo
02004006008001.0k199020052021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 899.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 52.63 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 174th and Congo ranks 172nd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 129.75 current US$ per square kilometre 137.96 current US$ per square kilometre 8.2 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 224.76 current US$ per square kilometre 275.03 current US$ per square kilometre 50.27 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 641.36 current US$ per square kilometre 577.72 current US$ per square kilometre 63.64 current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 846.88 current US$ per square kilometre 914.03 current US$ per square kilometre 67.16 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Bolivia or Congo?
Congo, at 952.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 899.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Bolivia and Congo?
52.63 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Congo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bolivia and Congo rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Bolivia ranks 174th and Congo ranks 172nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/congo-rep/">Bolivia vs Congo: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.