How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?

32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Bhutan

1,270 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Zimbabwe

1,291 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Bhutan rank

166th

Zimbabwe rank

165th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Bhutan
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1,291 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,270 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 21 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 165th of 208 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bhutan	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	57.7 current US$ per square kilometre	615.04 current US$ per square kilometre	557.34 current US$ per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2000s	169.72 current US$ per square kilometre	610.1 current US$ per square kilometre	440.38 current US$ per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2010s	720.06 current US$ per square kilometre	1,026 current US$ per square kilometre	306.43 current US$ per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	1,181 current US$ per square kilometre	1,220 current US$ per square kilometre	38.7 current US$ per square kilometre	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Bhutan or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 1,291 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,270 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Bhutan and Zimbabwe?: 21 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bhutan and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Bhutan ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 165th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/zimbabwe/">Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.