Belgium vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Belgium
131,769 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nauru
130,384 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Belgium rank
18th
Nauru rank
20th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Belgium
  • Nauru
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020052021

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 131,769 current US$ per square kilometre against 130,384 current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 1,385 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.

Belgium ranks 18th and Nauru ranks 20th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Nauru Difference Ahead
2000s 83,090 current US$ per square kilometre 69,569 current US$ per square kilometre 13,521 current US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 107,569 current US$ per square kilometre 92,683 current US$ per square kilometre 14,886 current US$ per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 125,400 current US$ per square kilometre 127,262 current US$ per square kilometre 1,862 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Belgium or Nauru?
Belgium, at 131,769 current US$ per square kilometre against 130,384 current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Belgium and Nauru?
1,385 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nauru?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Belgium and Nauru rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Belgium ranks 18th and Nauru ranks 20th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/naoero/">Belgium vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.